/script>

Administration of criminal justice system through the law enforcement agent

Administration of Criminal Justice System Through The law Enforcement Agent

  CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Law as one of the of the most influential mechanism for the administration of criminal justice in any society as well as a measure of social control creates some kind of orderly avenues under which individuals and corporate bodies (police force) may come together, join hands for the smooth running of administration of criminal justice system, maintenance of law and order, prevention of crimes, preservation of law and protection of lives and properties of an individual and society at large. It is to this effect that we have laws that regulate the functions of the police and spells out the obligation of an individual in the administration of criminal justice system in NigeriaPolice force or rather the Nigeria police force is the first and major law enforcement agent that contributes immensely towards the successful administration of criminal justice in the beginning. That was in Nigeria before, although the situation in the present day Nigeria has drastically changed. The 1999 Nigerian constitution as amended, the police Act, the criminal procedure code (applicable in the north), the criminal procedure Act (applicable to the southern part of the part ) and the penal code in the northern part of the country  and other states criminal codes are the laws that regulates  the administration of criminal justice system in Nigeria.
 In Nigeria today, people tents to perceived police as obstacles that delay the cause of criminal justice. This is because the attitude of the police in handling criminal cases may not be unconnected with some factors that may interfere with the speedy administration of criminal justice system this fact should not be taken for granted. And it is also a known fact that the police ethics and regulations are not being complied with by the police. In other words the attitude of the police may not be unconnected with the formidable arrays of police ethics, non compliance for which the body responsible will wield its big stick. On the other hand, the Nigerian populace may not have availed themselves with the fundamental rights of a citizens enshrine in the constitution because of their sheer ignorance about what the fundamental rights stands for. The tasks of ensuring that Nigerians will avail themselves with their rights and obligations should not be left alone to the police. On a final note, the researcher intends to focus in highlighting some issues that become major obstacles to the role of police in the administration of criminal justice system.  
1.2  STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
It is believed that for a country to be stable in every aspect of life there has to be an effective and efficient security system and it is only where there is peace and stability that a country will prosper. Police force in Nigeria plays a vital role in the administration of criminal justice system in Nigeria. Some of which includes maintenance of law and order, prevention of crime, investigation of crimes etc.
From the above, it can clearly be seen that police as law enforcement agent is vested with a wide range of powers in the administration of criminal justice system ranging from search to the prosecution of criminals. However, some times police perform military functions as may be prescribed by any statutes. A country can only attain the status of free crime or less crime state when they have a well organized system of police and policing.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The aims and objectives of this research work is geared towards a thorough analysis in the administration of criminal justice through the police vis-à-vis their role.
 This research aims to show the importance of the police in the administration of criminal justice system and policing in Nigeria, the use and abuse of their powers.  It is an undeniable fact that there is a serious abuse of powers by the police in Nigeria. As such, the researcher managed to examine some factors that lead to the abuse of such powers in the administration of criminal justice system. It is therefore the objectives of the researcher to examine, explain and suggest where necessary some solutions.
Finally, it is on the strength of the forgoing that this research work seeks to:
i)  Analyze he importance of the operational framework of the Nigerian police in the administration of criminal justice.
ii)  Discuss the abuse of powers by the police
iii) To highlights on the regulatory bodies of the police and their functions
iv)  Highlight on whether police adhere strictly to the laws guiding their role in the administration of criminal justice system
v) Discuss on whether or not the police infringe on human right of an individual
vi) Discuss dilemma in the police (political interference, corruption and extrajudicial killing).
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
 A country can only attain the status of free crime or less crime state when they have a well organized system of police and policing. But, the questions are:
1, Do we have a well organized system of police in Nigeria?
2, Do the police perform their duties well and without any interference from       the government, politicians and other privileged figures?
3, Who are the regulatory bodies of police and policing and how do they perform?
4, Do the police adhere strictly to the laws, rules and regulations and ethics guiding them?
5, What are the obstacles that hinder police from performing their duties in the administration of criminal justice system?
6, How can a dilemma in police (corruption and extra-judicial killing) be corrected?

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Security sector of a country is one of the most important sectors that contribute immensely to the development of almost each and every aspect of human Endeavour.  In other words rule of law/ equality before the law leads to justice and it is only where you have justice you will have peace and stability.  However, rule of law can only be achieved where you have a perfect and well organized police system as well as the credible personnel conscripted to that effect. This is exactly a system where justice prevails.  It is also the significance of this research work to enlightening the citizens of their rights and obligations, the police of their duties and responsibilities in order to avoid bias in the administration of criminal justice.
Finally, it is a notable fact that, it is only when you know where you came from that you know where you are heading to. This research work will by the grace of Allah s.w.t help Nigerians to make them acquainted with the historical development of police, the roles they played in the administration of criminal justice system and the challenges they are facing.
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The scope of this research is basically divided in to two major important aspects.
The first aspect will cover the general overview of the Nigerian police in the administration of criminal justice, how it all started that is police in pre-colonial era, colonial era and post colonial era.
The second aspect is an analysis on police and the roles they played in the administration of criminal justice, how organized is the system, and the challenges they face while on duty.
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS
Certain terms used in the course of compiling this research work are highlighted and briefly explain accordingly.
1.7.1 LAW
Law is a body of rules of conduct of binding legal force and effect, prescribed, recognized, and enforced by controlling authority.
1.7.2 LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT
Is a public agent who protects life and property, and uphold the law within a jurisdiction.
1.7.3      POLICE
Police is a civil force of national or local government responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and the maintenance of public order.
1.7.4      POLICING
Policing is a method used by a body of government employees trained for law enforcement, crime prevention and detection, and authorized to maintain the peace, safety and order of the public.
1.7.5      CRIME
 Crime is an action or omission that constitutes an offence that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law.
1.7.6 CRIMINAL
    Criminal is anyone convicted of a criminal offence.
1.7.7 JUSTICE
 Justice is the use of power as appointed by law, norms or standards to support fair treatment and due reward.
1.7.8 CRIMINAL JUSTICE
   Criminal justice is a system of practices and institution of government directed at upholding social control, deterring and mitigating crime, or sanctioning those who violated laws with criminal penalties and rehabilitation effort.
1.7.9 ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
 Criminal justice administration refer to the performance of activities such as detection, apprehension, detention, pre-trial release, post trial release, prosecution , adjudication, correction, supervision or rehabilitation of accused persons or criminal offenders or the collection, storage and dissemination of criminal history record information. 
1.7.10 RULE OF LAW
 This is a concept that law applies to every one equally
1.7.11 EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLING
This is the killing of a person by governmental authorities without a sanction of any judicial proceedings or legal process
1.7.12     CAUTIONARY WORDS
Are certain wards usually administered to the accused as a warning on the implication of his statements there are usually as follows:
“…you have the right to remain silent, and what ever you said may be used for you or against you...”
1.7.13           TRIAL WITHIN TRIAL
Trial within Trial refers to the procedure used to determine internal issues, such as the admissibility of certain issues in a proceeding.
1.7.14     POLITICAL TURBULENCE
Is a state of confusion characterized by unpredictability and uncontrolled change.
                                             CHAPTER TWO
                                       LITERATURE REVIEW                          
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The aim of this chapter is to review some of the writes-up similar, closer or relevant to this research work by some able scholars towards sanitizing the administration of criminal justice system in the society. Although there are a lot of write-ups on the subject matter each of which takes different dimension I, as a student of knowledge deems it necessary to consider of some important points that if not addressed, will become obstacles and may cripple the administration of criminal justice system in Nigeria. It is also important to consider the subject matter of this research work as a concept, the personnel involved and how the concept is perceived in some countries.
In a paper presentation titled “powers of the police and criminal justice” by Hon. Justice C.A. Johnson (former chief judge of Lagos state).  In the paper, the learned author concentrates on what he consider as cogs in the wheel of progress in police activities in the administration of criminal justice, starting from the time they make arrest to the time of interrogation of suspect, identification parade, confessional statement and violation of human right of the citizen. Much greater emphasis is how ever laid on the issue of confessional evidence.
However, even though the learned author in his wisdom extensively discussed administration of justice and the role the police play where he rightly said “….public prosecution is principally the fruits of police investigates powers”  
It is upon the effort of the police that judges build the administration of criminal justice. I n the areas of investigation of crime, apprehension of offenders, and often also the very prosecution of offenders, court are at the mercy of the police.”
From the above it is clear that the learned author hasn’t discussed anything that has to do with the discipline of police, especially where the police acted in excess of their powers. The researcher at this point deems it necessary to venture into the issue concerning the discipline of the police.
S.G. Ehindero in his book titled “the Nigeria police and human rights” stressed on the fundamental rights of the accused person especially while under investigation in the police custody, the use of force by the police and other issues on human rights the author posits “it is recommended that the provision of our domestic laws as they affect police powers of Arrest, search and Seizure, interrogation, charge and bail are well assimilated…”  
It has been reported many times over police while investigating criminal used excessive force which some times result into death of the accused person. Therefore, the researcher considers the issue of violation of human rights by the police so fundamental that needs a scholarly attention. For example the issues of extra judicial killing by the police also need to be addressed.
2.2     POLICE AND POLICING
The word police is derived from a Greek Word ‘polis’, meaning that part of noneecclesiastical administration having to do with safety, health and order of the state.
In Greek definition, police meant the art of governing and regulating the welfare, security needs and order of the city-state in the interest of public.
 To Romans the word police meant same as that of the Greek that is the symbol of power reside in the central authority.  
Finally Police is a civil force of national or local government responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and the maintenance of public order.
Policing on the other hand is a method used by a body of government employees trained for law enforcement, crime prevention and detection, and authorized to maintain the peace, safety and order of the public.
2.3     HISTORICAL DEVLOOPMENT OF POLICE/ HOW IT ALL STARTED?
The word police is derived from a Greek word ‘polis’ meaning that part of    Non-ecclecsiastical administration having to do with safety, health and order of the state. The Greek Politeria meant the art of governing and regulating the welfare, security need of the city in the interest of the public.
Although the word police is derived from Greek but it was the Romans that perfected the system. The roman Politia meant the something as the Greek Politeria. It was a symbol of power residing in central authority. Police in Rome was organized in ranks. There was a roman perfect which has under his control fourteen magistrate, each responsible for a district and assisted by vigils that patrol the streets, lectores who were law enforcement officers and Stationaii who were resident of the city blocks
In Britain policy developed as local affairs with a role which has remain till now, that is the responsibility of every person to maintain law and order. This role is rooted in the history and common law   tradition of Britain that each citizen has a duty to suppress crime and disorder within his area. Failure of which entitle the payment of fines. The burden of policing was placed on every adult citizen it was a vocational obligation. Policing manifests itself in the form of tything of the Saxon policy. The Frankpledge in the southern and eastern England after the Norman Conquest, 1066 and later parish constable system after the enactment of the statutes of Winchester 1285.
Before we briefly described the above systems, it is relevant to observed that policing and police work did not start as a paid up professional. It starts as a noble incorruptible profession with considerable responsibility and distinction in England.  When the first paid up profession police was proposed in Britain, it was strongly opposed by those who feared that such force would lead to repressed and threat to the freedom of individual and to democracy.
THE TYTHING SYSTEM
There was a system developed in Saxon where families were grouped in tens called Tythings.  The next stage of administration were Tythings to form hundred and the group of hundred to form a shire with a superior police officer as a shire reeve. They were held responsible for keeping law and order in their locality.
THE FRANK PLEDGE
Whereas the Tythings, the shire were supervised by the local lords, the frankpledge was a system of policing by a centrally controlled organ. When the Norman conquered England the Norman adopted the Saxon system of Tythings but modified into frankpledge. It sought to take control from the local lords, and placed it under the king. The frankpledge is a system in which the conqueror requests the conquered to be of good behavior. The system of frankpledge took over control from the local lords in the following ways:
A, ensuring that the money collected from  Tything lords went to the king treasury
B, Tythings were supervised by the medieval sheriff
C, defaulting tything members were brought before central courts whose judges were the kings.
It was this central control that lead to the demise of the system. The subsequent including King Alfred and john were unable to give the Frankpledge the support they deserved.  Court to try erring members sat only once in seven years before trial. On the other hand if they failed to arrest the erring tything members they were subjected to fine too.
THE PARISH CONSTABLE SYSTEM
The frank pledge system was replaced by the parish constable system in 1283. The statutes of Winchester was enacted, it instituted the watch and word system and gathered together the early form of policing.
Under the statute, man from each parish would serve a gratuitous one year term as parish constable. Each parish constable was responsible for organizing a group of watchman who would guard the gates of the town at night. Where there was a crime committed the parish constable would alert the entire parish by raising hue and cry. It requires al parish citizens to keep arms in their homes and give support to the parish   when the need arose.  The parish constable also performs the old Frankpledge duty of arresting offenders and brings them to court. However as the office of parish constable evolved,   series of central government measure gradually made the work of Parish constable less dignified and more cumbersome.
2.4  ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Criminal justice administration as a concept is defined to include the management of resources and personnel as well as hands-on work making sure the law is upheld.
In another definition criminal justice administration focuses on preserving and punishing illegal activities. The field also covers terrorism prevention, social policy and immigration policy. In addition working as an administration you can work in criminal justice administration as police officer, correction officer and probation officer or community relation advocate.
 According to Wikipedia criminal justice administration is a system of practices and institutions of government directed at upholding social control, deterring and mitigating crimes, or sanctioning those who violated laws with criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts. On the other hand those accused of crime have protection of law against abuse of investigation and prosecution power.
 In United State Criminal Justice Administration has been guided by the 1967 President’s Commission on (law enforcement and administration of justice) which issued a ground-breaking report “the challenge of crime in a free society)
In United Kingdom and Wales the criminal justice administration aims to reduce crime by bringing more offences to justice.
While in Canada it aims to balance the goals of crime control and crime Prevention.
 In Sweden, is to reduce crimes and to increase the security of people.
Finally in china it is to keep society to function well and to protect the person’s right.
 From the above concepts it can clearly be seen that the institutions shouldering the responsibilities of administration of criminal justice are
The legislature with a duty of creating laws, the Court to adjudicate and the Corrections (jail prison and probation)
The personnel mention in the concepts above are the police, judges, lawyers and other law enforcement agent.
Theoretically, Criminal justice is the branch of philosophy of law that deals with criminal justice and in particular punishment. The theory of criminal justice has deeply constructed into other areas of philosophy, such as political philosophy and ethic as well as the criminal justice in practice.
Some important question to be raised in the theory is;
I, what is criminal justice?
2, how criminal justice is distinct from other kind of justice of is it in fact distinct?
3, should we punish?
4, why should we punish?
5, whom should we punish?
6, how should we punish?
7, how much should we punish?
2.5 THEORY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AS DISTINCT FROM OTHER THEORIES
Typically, legal theorist and philosophers consider four distinct kind of justice namely:
Corrective justice, distributive justice, procedural and retributive.
However, criminal law falls under retributive justice a theory of justice that considers proportionate punishment or morally acceptable response to crime.  Retributive justice is best captured by the phrase ‘lex-talionis’ the principle of an eye for an eye which it self trace back to the book of exodus which received it most well known philosophical defense from Immanual Kant
However in most of the theories there is no way one can discuss criminal justice administration without making reference to the theory of punishment.  Punishment is plainly defined as a penalty imposed by a legal system along with stigma of wrongdoing or lawbreaking.  And it has the following types:
 1) Retributive theory
 2) Reformative theory
 3) I didn’t do it theory   
 4) Prevention theory
A closer examination of the above concepts and theories on the administration of criminal justice above reveals that there are some notable points and of vital importance in the administration of criminal justice.
The concepts of criminal justice administration discussed above turn out to entails the personnel whom are the administrators as well as the government institutions conscripted and established purposely for the administration of criminal justice respectively. The theories on the other hand include punishment.
However, as a Nigerian and under the Nigerian context I consider the above concepts and theories as incomplete, because of the absence of any disciplinary control over the administrator and the institutions established by the government. There is need to have a kind of disciplinary control especially on the issues of corruption and arbitrariness involving the administrator or the agencies.
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
 The aim of this chapter is to explain the methodology used in this research  work, that is the Area of study, Population of study, sample of  study and finally the method of  Data analysis. 
3.2 AREA OF STUDY
 The area of this study is Nigeria, commonly referred to as the federal republic of Nigeria. Nigeria is a federal constitutional in West Africa, bordering Benin in the west, Chad and Cameroun in the east, and Niger in the north. Its coast in the south lies in the Gulf of Guinea in the Atlantic Ocean. It comprises 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, where the capital Abuja is located.  Nigeria is officially a democratic secular country.
Modern day Nigeria has been the site of numerous kingdom and tribal states for millennia. The modern states originated from British colonial rule beginning in the 19th century, and the merging of the southern Nigeria protectorate and the northern Nigeria protectorate in 1914. The British setup Administrative and legal structures whilst practicing indirect rule through traditional chiefdoms. Nigeria become a formally independent federation in 1960, and plunged into civil war from 1967 to 1970, it has since alternated between democratically elected civilian governments and military dictatorship, until it achieved a stable democracy in 1999 with its 2011 presidential elections being viewed as the first to be conducted reasonably freely and fairly.
Nigeria is often referred to as the Giants of Africa. Owing to its large population and economy, with approximately 174 million inhabitants. Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa and the seventh most populous country in the world.
The country is viewed as multinational states, as it inhabited by over 500 ethnic groups of which the three largest are Hausa, Yoruba and Igbo, these egthnics Group speaks over 500 different languages and are identified with wide variety of cultures.
Nigeria is divided roughly in half between Muslims who live mostly in the northern, southwestern region and central part of the country and Christians who live mostly in the southern and central parts of the country as well. A minority of the population practice religion indigenous to Nigeria. Such as those native to Igbo and Yoruba peoples.      
3.3  POPULATION OF STUDY
 The population of study in this research work is the Nigeria police. The researcher at this point and in an attempt to give a brief highlight on the Nigeria police considers the following:
POLICE IN NIGERIA/ PRE-COLONIAL ERA
Prior to the onset of colonization by the British in 1861, traditional African policing method were rooted in the community and closely intertwined with social religious structures. The enforcement traditions belief and cultures were carried out by community structures as aged grades (formal organization whose membership is based on pre-determined age range secrets societies or vocational guides for example hunters, farmers, fishermen) though this different system of crime control and law and order was maintained largely without violence. However, police origin is a product of social crisis in the society. British is single out because there is similarity in the development of police in Britain and other countries, such as America, western European countries, India and even Nigeria. In India, imperial control led to a breakdown of traditional values and control which resulted in the revolt of 1857 against the British. Therefore, social unrest led to the development of the Indian police force. In the crises of poor emigrant and indigenous working class diving the middle 19th century resulted in the first police force in New York City in 1845. The police force fashioned one of the London police, initially were unarmed as was the London police counterpart, but later about 1857 revolver became part of their uniform.
COLONIAL ERA
THE HAUSA CONSTABULARY/ LAGOS POLICE FORCE 1861
In Nigeria the development of the policing and police force was on tangential direction to that of the British force.  British trade interest and the need to prevent squabbles between the native chiefs and imperial merchant were the impetus for the formation of the force. Consequently the police grew up as paramilitary force bearing arms from its inception. The consular guard established in 1861 consisting of thirty men was armed. In 1863, this  guard matured into Hausa police and by 1879, the later  developed into Hausa constabulary, it was armed and consisted of a commissioner, two assistant commissioner, a superintended and assistant superintendent,  a pay and a quartermaster and a master tailor and 250 other ranks.
THE ROYAL NIGER CONSTABULARY/NORTHERN POLICE FORCE 1886
The royal Niger constabulary established in Lokoja in 1886. It was an armed constabulary to protect its trade interest along the river Niger in the north. They were five (5) officers, 415 ranks.  But these increased to 15 officers and 1,003 ranks in 1898. Although the constabulary was disbanded in 1900 when the protectorate was proclaimed yet it achieved success in punishing slave dealers in Ilorin and Bida in 1897.
THE NIGER COAST CONSTABULARY 1894
In 1891 the oil river protectorate was declared with the headquarters at Calabar, this was the handwork of Annesley who found it increasingly difficult to carry out consular orders which were invariably against his interest. His mode of administration was a conflict model in cross river, with his force; he allowed his commercial interest to becloud his judgment. And the realization that early police force in his homeland in Britain developed as a result of cooperation and good will of the people.  Consequently the force was disbanded and in 1894 the Niger coast constabulary was formed.  This force survived for six years until 1900 when the colony and protectorate of southern Nigeria was proclaimed.
THE SOUTHERN POLICE FORCE
With the proclamation of the protectorate of the southern Nigeria a lot of men of the Niger coast constabulary def
THE AMALGAMATION/THE SOUTHERN POLICE 1930
In 1906 three separate police force existed in Nigeria there were the Lagos police force, the northern police force and the southern police force.  In the second half of 1906, the colony and the protectorate of Lagos were merged with the protectorate of southern Nigeria. In 1914 amalgamation between the southern and northern protectorate took place to form the colony of Nigeria. However, the southern and northern police force remains separate until 1930. On the 1st April 1930 there came into existence the Nigeria police force with headquarters in Lagos the inspector general then was Duncan.
After the 1930th the officers of the police force changed with the change in the colonial administration except that the African officers were barred from the covert senior rank such as superintendent. This defect persists until 1946.  The Richard Constitution of 1946 aimed at securing greater participation by Africans in the decisions of their own affairs. But the defect was not eradicated by the Richard Constitution of 1946 because the Constitution only set out to promote participation of Africans not management or conduct of their own affairs. 
About 1935 the colonial administration opted for a uniform title for its colonial police force.  As a result in 1937 the Nigerian police force changed the title of its head from inspector general police to commissioner of police. The titled of the assistant commissioner of police were assumed by the immediate subordinate Officers. The former Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of Police became Superintendent and assistant Superintendent.
POST COLONIAL ERA
THE 1960, 1963 CONSTITUTIONS AND THE POLICE FORCE
The 1960 constitution established the Nigeria police force as the federal force charged with the responsibility of maintaining law and order throughout Nigeria. However the constitution did not prevent the region from establishing their own police force.
At that time the command of the Nigeria police force was under the inspector general of police while the command of the regional police is under the commissioner of police. Two regulatory bodies were set out to regulate the conduct of the police force. The two bodies are:
1, The police council
2, Police service commission
Section 101 of the constitution provides that the police council shall be responsible for the organization and administration of the Nigeria police force and all matters relating thereto.
Similarly, section 103 of the constitution provides that the police service commission shall have the power to appoint persons to hold or act in the Nigeria police force including power to make appointment and promotion. However, before appointing a person in to the office of inspector general of police the police service commission must first consult the prime minister and the regional premier for the appointment of commissioner of police in the region respectively. The 1979 constitution failed to involve the state government in the administration of the force. Section 108 0f the 1979 constitution made no provision to that effect. Similarly the section also made no provision for the continual existence of the police council.  Section 195 (2) of the 1979 constitution provides that the Nigeria police force shall be under the command of inspector general of police  and any contingent of the Nigeria police force stationed in  state shall subject to the authority of inspector general of police be under the command of the commissioner of police of the  state.
On the 14th day of October 1986 the federal military government reorganized the Nigerian police force. It instructed the police force into five new directorates. Each headed by the deputy inspector general of police and even zonal commands. Each headed by assistant inspector general of police. The directorates are:
1, Operations
2, Finance and administration
3, Criminal investigation department
4, Logistics and supplies
5, Training
The zonal commands were;
1, Zone one includes Kano Kaduna Sokoto with headquarter at Kano
2, zone two: Lagos Osun and Oyo with headquarters at Abeokuta.
3, Zone three: Borno, Bauchi and Gongola with headquarters at Yola
4, Zone four:  Benue, Anambra and Plateu with headquarters at Makurdi
5, Zone five: Ondo Bendel with headquarters at Benin
6 Zone six rivers Imo and cross river with headquarters at Calabar
7, Zone seven Kwara, Niger and F.C.T Abuja with headquarter at Abuja.
With the creation of six additional state in 1996 Katsina became under zone one and one additional was created to include Lokoja Kwara, Ondo Ekiti and Osun with headquarters at Lokoja.
The departments are as follows:
i, Administration
ii, Operation
iii, Works
iv, General investigation
v, Training
vi, Research
Section 214 of the 1999 Nigerian constitution warranted the establishment of the Nigeria police force. The section provides as follows
There shall be a police force for Nigeria, which shall be known as
The Nigerian police force and subject to the provisions of this
Section no other police shall be established for the federation or
Any part thereof”
 Similarly, section 3 of the police Act provides
‘There shall be established for Nigeria a police force to known as the Nigeria police force…”
Section 4 f the police Act provides fore the general duties of the police that is the prevention and detection of a crime, apprehension of offenders, preservation of law, protection of lives and properties of citizens, enforcement of all laws and regulations and performing military duties as may be required of them or under the authority of any other Act.
In Nigeria today we have about three hundred and seventy one thousand eight hundred (371,800) police officers, thirty six 36 commands twelve (12) zones and seven (7) administrative organs.
 Moreover, police force is one of the law enforcement organs that have a widest power and these powers are provided by the following sections of the police Act. Sections ss.23 empowers the police to prosecute, ss.24 arrests without warrant, ss.25 arrests without warrant in procession, ss.26 deals with summons, section 27 empowers he police to grant bail to the person arrested without warrant. Section 28 of the police Act empowers the police to conduct search, section 29 to detain and search suspected persons and finally section 30 of the police Act empowers the police to take fingerprint.
The above sections went further to state that no other police shall be established for the federation apart from this one for the federation or any part thereof.
Section 215 of the constitution vested the power to appoint the inspector general of police to the president of the federal republic on the advice of the police council
Section 215 (3) provides that the president or such other minister of the federation as may be authorized in that behalf may give to the inspector general of the police such lawful directions with respect to the maintenance and security of the public safety
Similarly section 215(4) vested similar power to the governor of all the states in the federation and their commissioners.
3.4  SAMPLE OF THE STUDY
The sample of the study in this research work is the operational framework of the Nigeria police in relation to the Administration of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria.
3.5  METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS
 The method of Data analysis used in this research work is simply Content Analysis,

CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATIONM AND ANALYSIS

4.1 INTRODUCTION
The researcher at this juncture finds it necessary to present, discuss and analyzed  issues bordering on the general problems the police faced in the cause of the performing their duties ranging from organizational problems, the challenges they faced i.e. lack of equipments, welfare and incentives  to the issues of abuse of power, corruption  and extra-judicial killing.
       It is also the aim of this chapter is to have a clear understanding on the powers of police in relation to the administration of criminal justice in Nigeria as it flew and developed through the various administration and government transitions.  Police organization and police system in Nigeria experienced a series of reformation constitutionally, this is because of its sensitivity and importance as a sector saddled with the responsibility of maintaining law and order. It is believed that the health of any society defends on its security system. As such, the researcher at this point deems it necessary to ponder over the powers of police as it relates to criminal justice administration before moving on to the challenges.
4.2 POWERS OF THE POLICE TO SEARCH
Sections 28(1), (2), (3) and (4) of the police Act empowers the police conduct searches the sections say:
Section 28 (1) “A superior police officer may by authority under his hand authorize any police officer to enter any house, shop, warehouse or other premises in search of stolen property, and search therein and seize and secure any property he may believe to have been stolen, in the same manner as he would be authorized to do if he had a search warrant, and the property seized, if any, corresponded to the property described in such search warrant”
(2) “in every case in which any property is seized in pursuance of thus section, the person on whose the premises it was at the time of seizure of the person from whom it was taken if other than a person on whose premises it was may unless previously charged with receiving the same knowing it to have been stolen, be summoned or arrested and brought before the magistrate to account for his possession of such property and such magistrate shall make such order respecting the disposal of such property and may award such costs as the justice of the case may require”
(3) “ such authority as aforesaid may only be given when the premises to be searched are, or within the preceding twelve months have been in occupation of any person who has been convicted of receiving stolen property or of harboring thieves, or of any offence involving fraud or dishonesty, and punishable by imprisonment”
(4) “it shall not be necessary on giving that authority to specify any particular property, provided that the officer  granting the authority has reason to believe generally that such  property have been made a receptacle for stolen property”
4.3 POWER TO INVESTIGATE AND INTERROGATE
Section 4 of the police Act empowers the police with the following”
the police shall be employed for the protection and detection of crimes, the apprehension of offenders, the preservation of law and order, the protection of life and property and due enforcement of law and regulation with which they are directly charged,…..”
4.4 POWERS OF THE POLICE TO ARREST
Section 10 of the criminal procedure Act conferred to the police to arrest without warrant. Similarly Section 24 (1) of the police Act in addition to the power of the police under the above section the police Act provides:
“in addition to the powers to arrest without warrant conferred upon a police officer by section 10 of the criminal procedure Act, it shall be lawful to any police officer and  any person whom may  call to his assistance to arrest without warrant………”
Additionally, section 25 of the police Act empowers the police to arrest without having arrest in procession. The section provides as follows:
“Any warrant issued lawfully by any court for apprehending any person charged with any offence may be executed by any police officer at any giving time notwithstanding that the warrant is not in his possession at the time , but the warrant shall on the demand of the person apprehended, be shown to him as soon as practicable after his arrest ” .
4.5 POWERS OF THE POLICE TO PROSECUTE
Section 23 of the police Act vested in the police powers to prosecute
 The section provides:
“subject to the provisions of section 160 and 191 of the constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria which relate to the power of attorney general of the federation and of a state to institute and undertake, take over and continue or discontinue criminal proceeding against any person before any court of law in Nigeria any police person may in person conduct all prosecutions before any court whether or not the information of the complain was laid in his name”
4.6 POWER OF THE POLICE TO DETAIN AND CONDUCT SEARCH
Section 29m of the police Act empowers the police to detain and conduct search the section provide:
A police officer may detain and search any person whim he reasonably suspects of having in possession or conveying in any manner any thing which he has reason to believe to have been stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained”
4.7 POWER OF THE POLICE TO TAKE FINGERPRINT
Section 30 of the police Act confers unto the police the power to take fingerprint the section provides as follows:
It shall be lawful to any police officer to take and record for the purposes of identification and measurements, photographs and fingerprints impression all persons who may from time to time be in lawful custody”.
From the above it can be clearly be seen that police plays a vital role in the administration of criminal justice, in fact, police is the only law enforcement agent vested with the widest power but, the nagging question is now lies on the use or abuse of such power. This will by the grace of Allah swt be discussed in the following chapter. 
4.8 GENERAL PROBLEMS IN THE POLICE
Nigeria is often referred to as the giants of Africa, owing to its large population and economy. Land area (sq. km) in Nigeria was last measured at 910770 in 2014 according to the World Bank. According to 2006 census the population is 140, 341,790, in 2015 the estimate grow to 182, 202,000 with more than 30 states and over 700 local government area.  The question is now that we have not up to 100 000 thousand and not up to 25 police command across the country. If we consider the size of the population and the number of the police officers we have in the country, there is need for an expansion from every angle of the Nigeria police force.
Moreover, section 4 of the police Act provides for the general duties of the police that are the prevention and detection crimes, apprehension of criminals, and preservation of law an order and perform such other military function as may be required by any other Act. Taking into consideration the duties and responsibilities of police and the risk involved in it there s need to provide the police all that they need that will help them to discharge their responsibilities, but very unfortunate you may find a police officer being transferred to a distance place without transfer allowances he/she has to find their way to where they have been transferred. Similarly when it comes to the issues of equipment it is a known fact that police are short of equipment, requisite weapons and other important machines that will assist them in assist them. Some times this may lead the police to arrive at a crime scene at a later time. They may run away out fear especially while confronting armed robbers. 
In developed countries, the police are almost fully equipped at any time to the extent they have lie detector and other sophisticated gadget, thereby investigating and interrogating the suspect without any form inhuman treatment.
 As stated above the bodies responsible for regulating the affairs of the police are the police council and the police service commission. Apart from these two bodies is senate committee on police affairs though it doesn’t have constitutional backing.
It is a known fact that unnecessary transfer of a police officer who is in t he middle of investigation of a case may interfere with the cause o f justice.
Lack of equipment is another factor that leads to the deterioration of police duties. The poor management, low incentives, delay in salary and other entitlement are also some of the factors. You may in many occasions find situation where a police officer is transferred to a far distance location without transfer allowance. Adamu Ashana is a police officer serving under Sabon Gari divisional police station of Katsina state. Sometimes around 1999, Adamu was transferred to Adamawa state while serving in Adamawa where he was transferred to he had an accident and sustain serious injuries. He hasn’t been treated by the police in fact he has to take himself back to home for treatment.
The constitution and the police Act are the major laws that regulate the conduct of the police. But, the problem now is does the police adhere strictly to the provisions of those laws and the limitation set out in them? The answer to the above question is no ,this is because when it come to the issue recruitment of new police officers the recruitment's is not base on merit, is a question of whom you know.
Also when it comes to the issues of investigating a case, the usual techniques by the police is torture, inducement, duress and threat.  As regard to the right of an accused person they don’t care, sometimes you may find out they don’t bother to administer the cautionary ward to the accused person, when the matter move to court trial within trial has to be conducted to make sure the confessional statement made by the accused person was made voluntarily.
 However, it is clear from the above the duties of the police is the maintenance of law and order, preservation of law, prevention and detection of crime and protection of life and property of a citizens. But are they protecting the lives properties of the citizens?
Sometimes around 2000/2001 in Funtua local government area of Katsina state along Zaria-Funtua road a police officer shot and killed one Malam Abdallah simply because the driver of the car which Malam Abdallah happens to be a passenger refused to stop the car at the check point. In 2009 Muhammad Nasir Buhari from Taraba state was shot and killed by the police in Abuja at check point also. In august 2015 along Giwa-Zaria road, the anti-robbery squad shot and killed one Sufyanu Abdallah from Jos Plateu state. Sufyanu was just a driver of the car, the anti-robbery squad from SARS Kaduna state alleged that the deceased is involved in a robbery, and that he was killed in the crime scene when the police pursue them. While conducting my personal investigation in this matter, the police told me that they fired a warning shot and the bullet went through the boot and killed the deceased. A close examination of the car revealed that there isn’t any hole in the boot where the bullet went through and killed the deceased as claimed by the police. The deceased a father of two died in vain by the handiwork of police. Similarly, in 2010, the then chairman of Mashi local government of Katsina state together with the then commissioner of police Katsina state and some politicians invited one political party elder by the name Tasi Elder to the office of the commissioner police and murdered him. In 2007 the then government proposed a bill to senate for third term, there is a serious protest against such proposal and the government wanted to holds public hearing which most of the states of the federation refused to holds such public hearing. The then Katsina state Governor Umar Musa ‘Yar Adua host the public hearing on third term. There is a serious peaceful demonstration by the citizens of Katsina state. In an attempt to suppress the anger of the people the Katsina state Government ordered the police to use life ammunition which resulted in killing one person.
 Finally, the strict adherence to the rule of law by the police can only be achieved where the police organization become independent.
4.9 POLICE AUTONOMY
Section 215ssss of the 1999 constitution as amended vested the power to appoint the inspector general of police to the president of the federal republic of Nigeria on the advice of police council
Section 215 (3) provides that the president or such other minister of the federation as may be authorized in that behalf may give to the inspector general of the police such lawful directions with respect to the maintenance and security of the public safety
Similarly section 215(4) vested similar power to the governor of all the states in the federation and their commissioners.
From the above provisions of the constitution it can clearly be seen that the appointment of the inspector general of police is by the president and as such the inspector general of police is susceptible to all forms of interference and inducement by the president. 
In Nigeria today, we have witnessed many instances where the president     Ceased the opportunity of his powers and use the inspector general of police to win election. The former inspector general of police Mustafa Balogun on the 17th day of April 2005 was arrested for 13 billion naira fraud. Close examination of the case revealed that the former inspector general of police was used to win the election and dumped after winning the election.
4.10 POLICE AND HUMAN RIGHT
 In order to put police work into perspective, there is need to look in previous chapter on the origin of policing, the changing nature of the force as a core to policing in law enforcement. Of course this necessarily brings us to the discussion of the interplay between police duties and Human Right.
WHAT ARE THESE RIGHTS?
Human right are rights that you and I posses as human beings. They are inherent, inalienable and imperceptible rights aimed at preserving the worth and dignity of a persons as human beings.  They are not necessarily right of individuals but collective rights or rights of group.
These rights are not necessarily legal right as Osita (2004) want us to believe that, because people have them irrespective of whether they are enacted or not. According to A.J.M Milne (1998) human right are right which people have simply as human beings irrespective of nationality, religion, citizenship, marital status, occupation or income or other social and cultural characteristics, and also irrespective of sex. Milne went further to classify these rights in to legal, moral, social and customary rights. To him legal rights are rights conferred and correlative obligations imposed by a particular law which is part of a legal system of the community. His moral rights include the right to keep promise while his customary rights are those which arise out of custom and finally social rights are those which one can have as a member of a particular community, member of a voluntary association as clubs, trade union, etc.
However, chapter four of the 1999 constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria as amended is dedicated to the fundamental rights of a citizens as well as the accused person.  Sections 33 to 43 of the 1999 constitution provides for the following rights;
·        Rights to life
·        Right to dignity of human person
·        Right to personal liberty
·        Right to fair hearing
·        Right to private and family life
·        Right to freedom  of thought conscience and religion
·        Right to freedom of expression and press
·        Right to peaceful assemblies and association
·        Right to freedom of movement
·        Right to freedom from discrimination
·        Right to acquire and own immovable property any where in Nigeria
The above are the fundamental rights enshrined in the 1999 constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria as amended. Apart from the above, there are certain specific rights conferred upon as accused person to enjoy. They are as follows:
A, Presumption of innocence. Meaning that a person charged with criminal offence before a court of law is presumed innocence until he has been proof guilty by the prosecution.
B, Right to remain silence. An accused person has a right to remain silence that no body can forced him to testify against him self.      
C, Right against double jeopardy. Meaning that a person tied and      convicted in a particular court of law cannot be brought again before such a court and convicted for the same offence.
D, Right against retrospective Laws
E, Right to counsel of his own choice
F, Right against torture,
G, Right to explain to the accused person the nature of the offence he is been charged with in the language he understand.
H, Right to interpreter.
G, Right to be brought before a court of law within a reasonable time.
The above rights are mainly for the protection of accused person against the use of excessive powers of the police. Some times you may find a situation where the police implore torture from the initial stage of investigation against a suspect to extract information; it is also a common fact that trial within trial has to be conducted in criminal proceedings to make sure that the confessional statements by the accused person were made voluntarily.  This is because the method police adopted is always torture if not, threat and other forms of illegal ways they device to get the kind of information they want from a suspected criminals. However, sections 42 and 129 of the criminal procedure code provide that a person arrested for the commission of criminal offence must be charged before a court within the reasonable time. The sections specify the maximum of 24 hours; therefore accused person cannot be detained in the police custody for more than 24 hrs without being taken to court. However, you may find in many occasions the police exceeding the limitations setout by the law.  
  4.11 DILEMMA IN THE POLICE
According to section 9 of the police Act police council is the body saddled with the responsibilities of policy formation and administration of the force. The question now is does the council perform what its supposed to performing?
In the main we will consider the cogs in the wheel of progress in police activities in the administration of criminal justice as we know public prosecution is principally the fruit of police investigative powers. It is upon the effort of the police that judges build the administration of justice, the major problem is the political turbulence.
However the court can only deal with the type of cases presented by the prosecution before them, no matter how shoddily they are investigated and presented. Sometimes the police say they cannot get the potential witness whose evidence is very vital through negligence or sometimes they may even connive with the suspect or his relations, or deliberately failed to serve subpoena to witness or any order of the court.  It is very sad but undeniable truth that ordinary police men on whose shoulder the functioning of the system truly lies is eminently susceptible to corruption for a very small sum. These resulted from poor salary scale and bad leadership. Sometimes investigating officer may unnecessarily transfer to other distance place or compulsorily retired, these may also lead to delay in the administration of criminal justice. Section 20 of the police Act empowers the police to arrest without warrant, most times this power is exercised peremptorily or arbitrary.
On the other hand where there is political or other turmoil police they have been ask to undertake joint patrol with army personnel while with little or no education, bereft of sustained or any discipline  poorly clad and paid, denied value and other outfit with which too answer any sudden summon for aid . As such our police are the necessary easy target for corruption influence.
In other word policing a democratic society is never uncontroversial partly because policing is concern with the resolution of conflict and the control of behavior
Conflict arising from contradictions and inequalities in our society resulting in criminal offences and trade Demonstrations and disturbance. To prevent the commission of criminal offences and the dispute police have legal duties to do their duties and deny others their unconstitutional actions.
In performing these duties, the police are agent of the government and at the same time servant of the citizens. In a world short of sheikh full of sinners, the task of the police is arduous. More so, when the crimes and conflict in our society is against the state some time between interest group rather than between right and wrong. So that what ever action or omission police man takes is bound to offend the accused and a group of individuals. The sad action or omission is that these criminal and interest group do not believe in changing the law through the legal process but breaking it. They expect the police to bend the rule in their favor.
4.12 EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLING BY THE POLICE
This is the killing of a person by governmental authorities without a sanction of any judicial proceedings or legal process, extrajudicial punishment are mostly seen by humanity to be un-ethical, since they bypass the due process of the legal jurisdiction in which they occur. Extrajudicial killing often target leading political, trade union, dissident, religious and social figures, and may be carried out by the state government or other state authorities like the arm forces or police.
In May 1999 a democratic regime was inaugurated after a protracted period of military rule. Since the advent of democratic rule there have been uncountable incidences of politically motivated assassination, thuggery and banditry. The menace of armed robbery and other violent crimes has become phenomenal. Live and property has become very insecure in the Nigerian states. The various tiers of government in Nigeria have manifested their inability to secure the lives and property. In many instances there have been serious allegations of government involvement in some cases of extrajudicial killing. The various tiers of government have always come out to deny complicity in any extrajudicial killing in their area of jurisdiction. As a result of the inability of the state security apparatuses to preserve live and property, the people have taken the initiative of providing vigilante group. These vigilante groups employ the system of torture to extract confessional statement from suspects. They go further to kill robbery suspect without judicial trial.
The police are also frequently subjects suspect to torture for the purpose of extracting confessional statements from them, or to satisfy whoever employs them to make the arrest.  
4.13 THE KILLING OF MODU YUSUF (BOKO HARAM LEADER)
The extrajudicial killing of Modu Yusuf by the police and army has become a notorious fact that leads to the escalation of serious religious uprising claiming hundred thousand of innocent lives in Nigeria.
The awful video footage shown by the Aljazeera television  of the Nigerian police and army unit carrying out extrajudicial killing in the aftermath clashes with the Boko Haram members call to question the role played by the security forces in  the last Boko Haram uprising, in the footage a number of an unarmed civilians were seen forced to lie down on the streets and then shot at a cruel point blank range that were never seen any where,  more awful shocking pictures that came from the footage like fairy tale one of the officers was heard urging his colleagues not to shoot the unarmed civilian on the head but rather on the chest as he wanted his hat. The element of the army and police who staged the follow-up operation after the July’s Boko Haram uprising in which estimated thousands Nigerians were killed selecting individual at random after house to house search and taken to the police station shocked the world. The unfortunate footage broadcast and widely circulated on the internet shown unarmed men hurled and forcefully told to lie down on the street and shot on the head. As the execution continued on one man was told “sit properly, we want to take your picture” the kind of so called jungle justice emanating from the populous nation in Africa carried out by security officers who were meant to protect their citizens. In the contrast a metropolitan police officer in London was convicted and sentenced to 4 years imprisonment for trying to frame a web designer amounting to corruption and perverting the course of justice. Ali Diezei  who was branded criminal in uniform seen trying to frame an innocent man in 2008 was stripped of his $90 000 salary when he was found guilty of misconduct in public office and perverting the course justice after a four weeks trial at a southward crown court, Ali Diezei  the most senior minority police officer in London remained defiant describing the conviction as outrageous and a fit up accusing the authorities as having vendetta against him, while at least the rule of law prevails in London unlike extrajudicial killing by the Nigerian security personnel shown on the television   and relayed all over and yet the culprit were neither  brought to trial  nor hoped for justice   for the innocent unarmed civilians killed in self-styled cow boy vendetta killings despite the plea of showing mercy by thousands of people out site the police satiation. After the execution and army officer who appears to be in charge of the operation was shown handing over the command to a senior police officer who were clearly identified with the tags on their chest. Another person believed to have been in the random self-styled execution was late Malam Baba Fugu a respected community leader who was reported to have gone to the police to help them restore order but was subsequently killed without being tried by a court of law. Although, the government promised to set an inquiry into the unnecessary killing during the uprising which saw  the lives of an estimated 100 000 described as crime against the humanity yet nothing concrete has been done to bring to book the culprit who perpetrated these evil crime, according to Aljazeera such extrajudicial killing in Nigeria were wide spread letting the Nigeria police get away with killing hundred of people every year without the necessary investigation, many years have passed since the Boko Haram uprising who were only demonstrating against the western education who could have been dealt with rather than killing most of them, and nothing has been heard from the government as to whether the culprit have been brought to justice or not. During the operation the army captured among the others the leader of the group and handed him to the police alive who was shown on television, the leader of the uprising, Modu Yusuf was clearly shown handcuffed and surrounded by heavily armed police officers being questioned and later when his body was discovered by the press in a clear cover up he was said to have been killed while trying to escape. Notion contested by every one, the new York human right group described the killing of Yusuf as an extrajudicial killing and example of brazen contempt of the Nigerian police for the rule of law a contrast with Ali Diezei who only tried to frame an innocent person causing his four years jail term to be upheld those opening our eyes to the real rule of law in contrast with the Nigerian police justice system which is so unfortunate.

 CHAPTER FIVE

                     SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION

5.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter will by the grace of ALLAH S.W.T. be the last chapter of this research work and at this point summary, recommendation and conclusion will be dealt with.
5.2 SUMMARY
This research work begins by giving a highlight on what criminal justice administration is and the role of police as a law enforcement agent, the historical development of police and policing through the ages down to the development of police in Nigeria since before the coming of colonial masters to date. The research also cover the provisions of the constitution and police Act that warranted the establishment of police in Nigeria. Moreover, the researcher managed to discuss the organizational settings of the police as well as the powers of the police. The researcher finally ventures into the challenges police faced in Nigeria.  
5.3 CONCLUSION
The role of police in the administration of criminal justice is very vital, so much so that the stability of internal security of any civilized society defends on it. Sanitizing the entire police organization will definitely yield effective policing in Nigeria. The police council and the police service commission are the regulatory bodies of police in Nigeria. Police service commission and the police council implement sufficient regulation to enhance the growth and the development of police in the administration of criminal justice in Nigeria. In order to maintain justice, equality and fairness in the administration of criminal justice, there is need to put police under 24 hrs surveillance through the use of CCTV and surveillance cameras across the major cities.
5.4 RECOMMENDATION
 On the basis of this research work and findings, the following recommendations were made which if implemented will sanitize the police in Nigeria:
1)    Expanding the police organization in Nigeria by recruiting additional officers as well as establishing police institution in Nigeria.
2)    Educating the public on police duties and creation of community policing.
3)    Better salary scale and incentives will also improve policing in Nigeria.
4)    Taking a disciplinary action on any police who violates human right of an individual or who use torture, threat, inducement and coercion on the suspect to extract information.   
                                      REFERENCES
1999 Constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria as amended.
Criminal Procedure Code (CAP. 30)
Fundamental rights  (Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009 )
The Police Act
5)    Adebayo, A.M (2012) Administration of Criminal Justice System in Nigeria, Princeton Publication Co. Ikeja, Lagos.
6)    Newman, D.J (1978): Intrduction to Criminal Justice New York Lippincolt.
7)     Ehindero S.G. (1998) the Nigeria Police and Human Rights Ehindero Nigeria (NIG.) LTD. JOS (printing division)
8)    Garner, B.A. (2004) Blacks Law Dictionary 8th Edition, New York.
9)    Doherty, O. (1999): Criminal Procedure Law and Practice, London, Blackstone.
10)                        HON. C.A. Johnson (1990) Powers of Police and Criminal Justice.
11)                        Danbazau, A.B. (2007) Criminology and Criminal Justice, Ibadan, Spectrum Books Limited.
12)                        Danbazau A.B. (1994): Law and Criminology in Nigeria, Analytical Discuss, Ibadan University Press.
13)                        Abdullahi U. (2009) Steps through the Law, YWC Publishers Wuse Abuja.
14)                        Ikechi, C.M (2012): To Do Justly, Great Britain CPI Group (UK) Ltd.
15)                        Chukol, K.S. (1998)  The Nigerian Criminal Law, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria.
16)                        Ayo. A.M. (1999) Human Right and the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria.

No comments:

Post a Comment